Granville Rose v. Camille Buras
Granville Rose v. Camille Buras
Opinion
Case: 16-31171 Document: 00514234886 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-31171 FILED Summary Calendar November 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GRANVILLE ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CAMILLE BURAS; EDDIE JORDAN; AUTHER MOREL; FLOYD TRUHILL; MYRTLE GATHE THOMPSON; STACEY THOMPSON; LATOYA GATHE; LOUISIANA STATE; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; MARTIN REGAN; KARLA BAKER; ARIS COX; THOMAS CALOGERO; AARON RIVES; JAMES BUDDY CALDWELL, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:15-CV-880
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Granville Rose filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against several defendants to raise several claims concerning his conviction for sexual battery. The district court dismissed the suit as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 16-31171 Document: 00514234886 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2017
No. 16-31171 (1984), and denied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion that Rose filed with respect to that judgment. Rose now appeals the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, and he has also filed several motions with this court requesting various forms of relief. Rose has not shown that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 60(b) motion. See Diaz v. Stephens, 731 F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2013). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and all outstanding motions are DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.