Sandra Libai Najera-Mejia, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions this court for review of the dismissal by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of her appeal of an Immigration Judge’s denial of a motion to reopen proceedings in which she was ordered removed in absentia. Najera-Mejia argues that the BIA failed to consider the exceptional circumstances that warranted reopening of the proceeding.

Due to her failure to brief any challenge to the BIA’s determination that her third motion to reopen was numerically barred from consideration pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii), Najera-Mejia has abandoned any such challenge. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003) (citing Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987)). Additionally, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider Najera-Mejia’s challenge to the BIA’s wholly discretionary determination that her ease did not present exceptional circumstances warranting sua sponte reconsideration. See Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 248-50 (5th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, Najera-Mejia’s petition for review is DISMISSED, in part, for lack of jurisdiction and DENIED, in part.