U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Julio Martinez

United States v. Julio Martinez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 22, 2017

United States v. Julio Martinez

Opinion

Case: 17-40104 Document: 00514246966 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-40104 FILED November 22, 2017 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JULIO CESAR MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1124-3

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40104 Document: 00514246966 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2017

No. 17-40104 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.