U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Toney

United States v. Toney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2017 · Graves, Haynes, King
685 F. App'x 362

United States v. Toney

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Corey Toney has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Toney has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s' assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for *363leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.