U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Mendoza-Barcenas

United States v. Mendoza-Barcenas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2017 · Graves, Haynes, King
686 F. App'x 255

United States v. Mendoza-Barcenas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isaías1 Mendoza-Barcenas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Barcenas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

. Mendoza-Barcenas’s first name is sometimes misspelled as "Isais.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.