U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Cruz-Castillo

United States v. Cruz-Castillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 17, 2017 · Davis, Higginson, Southwick
689 F. App'x 344

United States v. Cruz-Castillo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Cruz-Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed an initial brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.