U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Russell

United States v. Russell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 26, 2017 · Davis, Higginson, Southwick
689 F. App'x 824

United States v. Russell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Tramell Russell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *825L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Russell has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Russell’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.