U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Pineda-Urquia

United States v. Pineda-Urquia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 30, 2017 · Graves, Jolly, Smith
690 F. App'x 160

United States v. Pineda-Urquia

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Alonso Pineda-Urquia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed original and supplemental briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pineda-Urquia *161has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.