U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Tlaseca

United States v. Tlaseca
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 22, 2017 · Dennis, Southwick, Wiener
697 F. App'x 418

United States v. Tlaseca

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Armando Tlaseca has moved for leave to *419withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tlaseca has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We agree with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *419published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.