The attorney appointed to represent James Gatlin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief m accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 682 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gatlin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused fi’om further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.