Joe Dell Sterling, federal prisoner # 18324-078, challenges the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, urging that the district court erred in determining that he was ineligible for a sentencing reduction. He asserts that his sentence was tied to a guidelines range as his factual resume stipulated that he was aware that the conspiracy involved 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana, which resulted in the same base offense level as was used by the probation officer. As a result, Sterling contends that his sentence, which exceeded the guidelines range calculated by the probation officer, constituted an upward departure and that he was entitled to a commensurate departure under the newly applicable guidelines range.

As the district court determined, appellant was not eligible for a reduction because his sentence was not “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2). Rather, the district court sentenced appellant to 240 months in prison based on his binding agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). See Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S. 522, 584-40, 131 S.Ct. 2685, 180 L.Ed.2d 519 (2011) (Sotomayor, J., concurring); United States v. Benitez, 822 F.3d 807, 809-12 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction is AFFIRMED. See Freeman, 564 U.S. at 534-40, 131 S.Ct. 2685 (Sotomayor, J., concurring); Benitez, 822 F.3d at 809-12.