Jordan Jericho Bautista-Gunter appeals his guilty plea convictions for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and carrying a weapon on an aircraft. He argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the Government breached its promise, contained in his plea agreement, that it would not oppose his receipt of a U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.

We need not decide whether the Government breached the plea agreement because it cured any breach by making sufficiently clear, both in its amended sentencing memorandum and during Bau-tista-Gunter’s sentencing hearing, its intention to remain silent regarding whether Bautista-Gunter should receive the § 3E1.1 adjustment. See United States v. Purser, 747 F.3d 284, 293-94 (5th Cir. 2014). Although the Government referred during the sentencing hearing to the position expressed in its original sentencing memorandum, the Government’s expressions of its intention to remain silent in accordance with the plea agreement were not “equivocal or half-hearted.” Id. at 293 n.44.

AFFIRMED.