U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Noe Constanza-Cordon

United States v. Noe Constanza-Cordon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 21, 2018

United States v. Noe Constanza-Cordon

Opinion

Case: 17-40437 Document: 00514354690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40437 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2018 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. NOE CONSTANZA-CORDON, also known as Noe Biganza, also known as Emigdio Ortiz Gutierrez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-1008-1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Noe Constanza- Cordon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Constanza-Cordon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40437 Document: 00514354690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018

No. 17-40437 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.