U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Ivan Millan-Bibiano

United States v. Ivan Millan-Bibiano
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2018

United States v. Ivan Millan-Bibiano

Opinion

Case: 17-40659 Document: 00514370715 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/02/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-40659 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar March 2, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff–Appellee v. IVAN MILLAN-BIBIANO, Defendant–Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17-CR-145-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Millan-Bibiano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Millan-Bibiano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40659 Document: 00514370715 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/02/2018

No. 17-40659 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.