Mohammed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran unsuccessfully pursued claims based on alleged damage to his laptop, and we dismissed his appeal as frivolous. See Omran v. United States, 668 Fed.Appx. 131, 131-32 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1343, 197 L.Ed.2d 532 (2017). He now appeals the dismissal of a motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in an attempt to revive his dismissed claims. We affirm.

Omran fails to demonstrate that the original judgment is void or any other basis for Rule 60(b) relief. See Norris v. Causey, 869 F.3d 360, 366 (6th Cir. 2017); Pryor v. U.S. Postal Service, 769 F.2d 281, 286 (5th Cir. 1985). Furthermore, under these circumstances, he also fails to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion by prohibiting the filing of additional meritless challenges to the judgment in this closed case. See Farguson v. MBank Houston, N.A., 808 F.2d 358, 359-60 (5th Cir. 1986).

AFFIRMED.