Odis Banks v. Lupe Valdez
Odis Banks v. Lupe Valdez
Opinion
Case: 17-10547 Document: 00514395536 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-10547 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar March 21, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce ODIS BANKS, Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellant v. LUPE VALDEZ, Dallas County Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CV-3340
Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Seeking to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Dallas County Sheriff Lupe Valdez, Odis Banks, Texas prisoner # 1717887, moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and for the appointment of counsel. As a threshold matter, this court must determine whether it has jurisdiction to entertain Banks’s appeal. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-10547 Document: 00514395536 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
No. 17-10547 appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). In a civil matter, a notice of appeal must be filed within days of entry of the judgment or order being appealed. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A).
The district court entered its judgment dismissing Banks’s complaint on December 29, 2015. The notice of appeal giving rise to this appeal is dated May 5, 2017. As Banks’s notice of appeal is untimely, his IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A); Bowles, 551 U.S. at 214. Banks’s motion for appointment of counsel is also DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.