United States v. Richard Cunningham, Jr.
United States v. Richard Cunningham, Jr.
Opinion
Case: 17-10818 Document: 00514395702 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-10818 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit Summary Calendar FILED March 21, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICHARD CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, JR., Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-62-3
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Richard Charles Cunningham has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cunningham has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cunningham’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-10818 Document: 00514395702 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
No. 17-10818 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.