U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Miguel Medina-Reyes

United States v. Miguel Medina-Reyes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 2, 2018

United States v. Miguel Medina-Reyes

Opinion

Case: 17-50639 Document: 00514455735 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-50639 FILED Summary Calendar May 2, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIGUEL MEDINA-REYES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CR-8-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Medina-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medina-Reyes has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Medina-Reyes’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50639 Document: 00514455735 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2018

No. 17-50639 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.