U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Anuoluwapo Adegbemigun

United States v. Anuoluwapo Adegbemigun
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 7, 2018

United States v. Anuoluwapo Adegbemigun

Opinion

Case: 17-60633 Document: 00514504100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-60633 FILED Summary Calendar June 7, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANUOLUWAPO SEGUN ADEGBEMIGUN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:14-CR-33-17

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Anuoluwapo Segun Adegbemigun has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Adegbemigun has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-60633 Document: 00514504100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2018

No. 17-60633 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.