U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Luis Munoz-Padron

United States v. Luis Munoz-Padron
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 21, 2018

United States v. Luis Munoz-Padron

Opinion

Case: 17-41132 Document: 00514521647 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41132 June 20, 2018 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. LUIS RAUL MUNOZ-PADRON, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17-CR-603-1

Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Luis Raul Munoz-Padron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Munoz-Padron has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-41132 Document: 00514521647 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018

No. 17-41132 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.