United States v. Cameron Hollie
United States v. Cameron Hollie
Opinion
Case: 17-10947 Document: 00514520704 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-10947 June 20, 2018 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMERON CHARLES HOLLIE, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-196-9
Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cameron Charles Hollie has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hollie has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hollie’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-10947 Document: 00514520704 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
No. 17-10947 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hollie’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.