United States v. Leonel Gonzalez-Castillo
United States v. Leonel Gonzalez-Castillo
Opinion
Case: 17-50752 Document: 00514525208 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-50752 FILED Summary Calendar June 22, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONEL GONZALEZ-CASTILLO, also known as Cristobal Gonzalez, also known as Froilen Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:17-CR-61-1
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel Gonzalez- Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Castillo has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of his claims of
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-50752 Document: 00514525208 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2018
No. 17-50752 ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Castillo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.