U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Charles Harris

United States v. Charles Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2018

United States v. Charles Harris

Opinion

Case: 17-20439 Document: 00514534086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-20439 FILED Summary Calendar June 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHARLES HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-262-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Charles Harris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Harris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-20439 Document: 00514534086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2018

No. 17-20439 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.