U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Baltazar Rodriguez-Vasquez

United States v. Baltazar Rodriguez-Vasquez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2018

United States v. Baltazar Rodriguez-Vasquez

Opinion

Case: 17-40604 Document: 00514545085 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-40604 July 9, 2018 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BALTAZAR RODRIGUEZ-VASQUEZ, also known as Abuelo, also known as El Viejo, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-38-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Baltazar Rodriguez-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40604 Document: 00514545085 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2018

No. 17-40604 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.