U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Jaime Lopez-Estrada

United States v. Jaime Lopez-Estrada
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 13, 2018

United States v. Jaime Lopez-Estrada

Opinion

Case: 17-50842 Document: 00514554370 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-50842 July 13, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME LOPEZ-ESTRADA, also known as Uriel Lopez, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-2321-1

Before KING, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jaime Lopez-Estrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Lopez-Estrada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50842 Document: 00514554370 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2018

No. 17-50842 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.