U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Juan Espino-Gomez

United States v. Juan Espino-Gomez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 18, 2018

United States v. Juan Espino-Gomez

Opinion

Case: 17-50926 Document: 00514561337 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-50926 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar July 18, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN EDUARDO ESPINO-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-172-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Eduardo Espino-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espino-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50926 Document: 00514561337 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2018

No. 17-50926 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.