U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. David Muniz Cereceres

United States v. David Muniz Cereceres
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2018

United States v. David Muniz Cereceres

Opinion

Case: 17-50494 Document: 00514574846 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-50494 FILED Conference Calendar July 27, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DAVID MUNIZ CERECERES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-1442-12

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent David Muniz Cereceres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Muniz Cereceres has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50494 Document: 00514574846 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/27/2018

No. 17-50494 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.