U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. William Maglicco

United States v. William Maglicco
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2018

United States v. William Maglicco

Opinion

Case: 17-11401 Document: 00514577657 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-11401 Fifth Circuit FILED Conference Calendar July 30, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. WILLIAM LEE MAGLICCO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14-CR-190-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Lee Maglicco in his appeal of his revocation of supervised release and resulting seven-month sentence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maglicco has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-11401 Document: 00514577657 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/30/2018

No. 17-11401 During the pendency of this appeal, Maglicco completed the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from custody.

Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.