U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Israel Brito

United States v. Israel Brito
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2018

United States v. Israel Brito

Opinion

Case: 17-50104 Document: 00514577338 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-50104 Fifth Circuit

Conference Calendar FILED July 30, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ISRAEL BRITO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-132-2

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Israel Brito has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brito has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. See United

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50104 Document: 00514577338 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/30/2018

No. 17-50104 States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.