United States v. Morris Okolo
United States v. Morris Okolo
Opinion
Case: 17-20053 Document: 00514601451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-20053 FILED Conference Calendar August 15, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MORRIS BROWN OKOLO, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-765-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Morris Brown Okolo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Okolo has not filed a response. Although Okolo remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the revocation term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-20053 Document: 00514601451 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2018
No. 17-20053 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.