United States v. Victor Castillo-Gonzalez
United States v. Victor Castillo-Gonzalez
Opinion
Case: 18-40131 Document: 00514623251 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/30/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-40131 August 30, 2018 c/w No. 18-40133 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. VICTOR HUGO CASTILLO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-141-1 USDC No. 1:17-CR-490-1
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo Castillo-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo-Gonzalez has filed a response.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-40131 Document: 00514623251 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/30/2018
No. 18-40131 c/w No. 18-41033 The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Castillo-Gonzalez’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the records reflected therein, as well as Castillo-Gonzalez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.