U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Marco Baho

United States v. Marco Baho
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 6, 2018

United States v. Marco Baho

Opinion

Case: 18-20137 Document: 00514631014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-20137 FILED Conference Calendar September 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO A. BADILLO BAHO, also known as Jose Luis Mendoza, also known as Jose Mendoza-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-461-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco A. Badillo Baho has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Badillo Baho has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-20137 Document: 00514631014 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2018

No. 18-20137 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.