U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Mario Castillo

United States v. Mario Castillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2018

United States v. Mario Castillo

Opinion

Case: 17-50742 Document: 00514657237 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-50742 FILED Conference Calendar September 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO CASTILLO, also known as Alberto Mario Castillo, also known as Alberto Castillo, Jr., also known as Mario A. Castillo, also known as Mario Alberto Castillo, also known as Alberto M. Castillo, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:16-CR-530-3

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mario Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50742 Document: 00514657237 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/26/2018

No. 17-50742 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.