U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Ruben Rangel-Vargas

United States v. Ruben Rangel-Vargas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 11, 2018

United States v. Ruben Rangel-Vargas

Opinion

Case: 17-11267 Document: 00514678321 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/11/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-11267 FILED Conference Calendar October 11, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. RUBEN RANGEL-VARGAS, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-501-2

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Rangel-Vargas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rangel-Vargas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rangel-Vargas’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-11267 Document: 00514678321 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/11/2018

No. 17-11267 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.