U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Ricardo Salazar-Razo

United States v. Ricardo Salazar-Razo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 26, 2018

United States v. Ricardo Salazar-Razo

Opinion

Case: 17-20791 Document: 00514699232 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20791 United States Court of Appeals Conference Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED October 26, 2018 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO SALAZAR-RAZO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-342-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ricardo Salazar-Razo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Salazar-Razo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Salazar-Razo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-20791 Document: 00514699232 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2018

No. 17-20791 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Salazar-Razo’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.