U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Ivan Servin

United States v. Ivan Servin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 10, 2018

United States v. Ivan Servin

Opinion

Case: 17-50247 Document: 00514754392 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-50247 December 10, 2018 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. IVAN SERVIN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-1478-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ivan Servin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Servin has filed responses. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Servin’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-50247 Document: 00514754392 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2018

No. 17-50247 therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review.

See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Servin’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.