U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Brent Blaylock

United States v. Brent Blaylock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2018

United States v. Brent Blaylock

Opinion

Case: 18-10437 Document: 00514756764 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-10437 December 11, 2018 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BRENT ERVIN BLAYLOCK, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-220-1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brent Ervin Blaylock has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Blaylock has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-10437 Document: 00514756764 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2018

No. 18-10437 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.