Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Ciriza-Saenz

United States v. Ciriza-Saenz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 12, 2018 · Prado, Reavley, Southwick
709 F. App'x 287

Counsel

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee, Mario Alberto Ciriza-Saenz, Pro Se

United States v. Ciriza-Saenz

Cases that cite this one

50 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Alberto Ciriza-Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ciriza-Saenz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.