United States v. Rotenberry
Opinion of the Court
The attorney appointed to represent Lonnie Lee Rotenberry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rotenberry has filed a response. We have reviewed the Anders briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rotenberry’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- United States v. Lonnie Lee ROTENBERRY, also known as \Throwed Off\""
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published