United States v. Bernardo Mendez-Marquez
United States v. Bernardo Mendez-Marquez
Opinion
Case: 18-50138 Document: 00514782085 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 18-50138 FILED January 4, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BERNARDO MENDEZ-MARQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-2354-1
Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bernardo Mendez- Marquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendez-Marquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-50138 Document: 00514782085 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2019
No. 18-50138 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, we note that there is a clerical error in the written judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. The judgment states that, in revoking Mendez-Marquez’s supervision, the district court granted a pleading filed on July 18, 2017, rather than a pleading filed on December 12, 2017.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.