United States v. Kentrell Davis
United States v. Kentrell Davis
Opinion
Case: 18-10648 Document: 00514813522 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/29/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 18-10648 Fifth Circuit FILED Conference Calendar January 29, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENTRELL DAVIS, also known as “Zeal”, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-264-9
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Kentrell Davis has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Davis has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Davis’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel;
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-10648 Document: 00514813522 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/29/2019
No. 18-10648 we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Davis’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Davis’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.