U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Marvin Rhine

United States v. Marvin Rhine
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 6, 2019

United States v. Marvin Rhine

Opinion

Case: 18-40330 Document: 00514825345 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-40330 FILED Conference Calendar February 6, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARVIN JAMES RHINE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17-CR-31-6

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Marvin James Rhine has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Rhine has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-40330 Document: 00514825345 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2019

No. 18-40330 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.