U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Carlos Lema-Tamay

United States v. Carlos Lema-Tamay
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 6, 2019

United States v. Carlos Lema-Tamay

Opinion

Case: 18-40722 Document: 00514825025 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 18-40722 FILED February 6, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CARLOS HERIBERTO LEMA-TAMAY, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-750-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Heriberto Lema-Tamay has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lema-Tamay has not filed a response.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-40722 Document: 00514825025 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2019

No. 18-40722 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.