U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

Bruce Anderson v. State of Texas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 19, 2019 · Higginbotham, Graves, Willett

916 F.3d 404 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Lawrence Morales, II, Esq., Allison Sarah Hartry, Morales Law Firm, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Heather Gebelin Hacker, Assistant Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, Eric Alan Hudson, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Financial Litigation & Charitable Trusts Division, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Hall v. Adams County (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 2021)
Caldwell v. Medina (District Court, W.D. Texas 2020)
Boland v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*405 Anderson notes that after we issued our decision, Gregory Perkes was nominated by the Governor to once again serve as a justice on the Thirteenth Court of Appeals. This relates "to changed circumstances since the case was decided by the district court" and by our panel, which do not provide grounds for panel rehearing. 1 Our decision and denial of rehearing are "[w]ithout prejudice to [the] pursuit of any appropriate remedies which may be available in the district court." 2 We express no opinion on the availability of further relief in the context of the close professional relationship between judge and staff attorney.

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little John , 347 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1965) (mem.); see also Armster v. U.S. Dist. Court , 806 F.2d 1347 , 1356 (9th Cir. 1986) ("A panel is simply not capable of having overlooked or misapprehended 'points of ... fact' occurring subsequent to its initial decision."); 16AA Fed. Prac. & Proc. Juris. § 3986.1 (4th ed.) ("New factual material, including material concerning events occurring after the initial decision, is not likely to be considered [in a petition for panel rehearing].").

Anastasiadis , 347 F.2d at 823 .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.