United States v. William Crisp
United States v. William Crisp
Opinion
Case: 18-11110 Document: 00514842903 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11110 FILED Conference Calendar February 20, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. WILLIAM RANDY CRISP, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-134-1
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Randy Crisp has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Crisp has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Crisp’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-11110 Document: 00514842903 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2019
No. 18-11110 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.