U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Mallou Holifield, III

United States v. Mallou Holifield, III
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 22, 2019

United States v. Mallou Holifield, III

Opinion

Case: 18-60257 Document: 00514847707 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/22/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-60257 February 22, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MALLOU HOLIFIELD, III, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:17-CR-31-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mallou Holifield, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Holifield has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-60257 Document: 00514847707 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/22/2019

No. 18-60257 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.