U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Thomas Chestnut, Jr.

United States v. Thomas Chestnut, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 4, 2019

United States v. Thomas Chestnut, Jr.

Opinion

Case: 17-51121 Document: 00514858469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-51121 FILED March 4, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. THOMAS ANTHONY CHESTNUT, JR., also known as Thomas Anthony Chestnut, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:17-CR-70-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Anthony Chestnut, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chestnut has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-51121 Document: 00514858469 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2019

No. 17-51121 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.