United States v. Dayton Steptoe
United States v. Dayton Steptoe
Opinion
Case: 18-10891 Document: 00514880695 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-10891 United States Court of Appeals Conference Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED March 20, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff−Appellee, versus DAYTON DESHAUN STEPTOE, Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:17-CR-390-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Dayton Steptoe has moved to with-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-10891 Document: 00514880695 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2019
No. 18-10891 draw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Steptoe has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow a fair evaluation of Steptoe’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). Steptoe’s motion for appointment of new counsel on appeal is DENIED as untimely.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and Steptoe’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal pre- sents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi- bilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.