Case: 18-11031 Document: 00514883440 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-11031 March 21, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARTURO TORRES-CABRERA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-627-1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Arturo Torres-Cabrera appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation and his sentence of 33 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release. He argues that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum because the enhanced penalty provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) is unconstitutional. He also asserts that his guilty plea was involuntary because he was not admonished that his prior felony conviction could only be used to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-11031 Document: 00514883440 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2019

No. 18-11031 enhance his sentence under § 1326(b)(1) if it was submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

However, Torres-Cabrera has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief conceding that these issues are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). He explains that he has raised the issues only to preserve them for possible further review.

Accordingly, because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Torres-Cabrera’s motion is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.