United States v. Karel Machado-Almeida
United States v. Karel Machado-Almeida
Opinion
Case: 18-50268 Document: 00514946045 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-50268 May 7, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KAREL MACHADO-ALMEIDA, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-1386-1
Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Karel Machado-Almeida has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Machado-Almeida has not filed a response. Although Machado- Almeida remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-50268 Document: 00514946045 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2019
No. 18-50268 portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.